Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how Islamic clerics in the Western Cape conceptualise and address contemporary medical-ethical questions. It situates their reasoning against the limits of the four-principle framework of biomedical ethics when applied to Islamic moral thought grounded in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and Sufi ethical cultivation. Using qualitative content and discourse analysis, the study applies a critical framework that combines Al-Zuhayli’s neo-traditional usūlī paradigm with Auda’s maqāṣid-based reformist approach to analyse primary data from local clerics and archived fatāwā from regional judicial bodies. The findings indicate no single dominant methodological tendency: while many clerics consult medical experts and engage contemporary realities, their final rulings frequently revert to traditional patterns that prioritise preservation of life. Proactive notions of well-being and medical-ethical reform remain underdeveloped. The diversity and inconsistency across verdicts highlight the absence of a coherent medical-ethical framework in the Western Cape and the need for structured collaboration between jurists, clinicians, and scholars of Islamic legal theory.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusha Salie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
